For example, if you don't have anyone to monitor servers and have limited Drupal expertise on staff, you'll be restricted to managed Drupal hosting. Your answers to these will limit or expand your potential hosting options before you even evaluate them. If the website goes down in the middle of the night, do you need someone to take that call? If you did an in-house solution, would you need to hire another person, or would you need to contract with a company for first-tier support? You might have the expertise on staff to manage your own hosting, spin up servers, secure them, and maintain them.īut will they have the dedicated time to do this? Are there other priorities that could pull them away from these duties? Go back to your performance goals. Your options are limited based on your in-house resources and their availability. What are your in-house capabilities? And are they available? The earlier you get this information, the better. This automatically eliminated certain providers. For example, we had one client who would not use anything that used AWS under the hood. These political goals might be hidden and come out of hiding at the most inconvenient times, so be sure and dig deep. One of your top goals may just be to remove yourself from your current vendor, whatever the cost. A stakeholder with lots of authority may have something against a particular hosting provider. But what happens if one of those websites runs a big, viral promotion and gets a traffic surge? Will all the other sites go down?ĭon't forget organizational politics. This is fine as long as the sites don't get much traffic. If you have lots of smaller websites and are optimizing for costs, that means shared resources. One provider might be able to do it well, but the cost might be prohibitive. If you are hosting one large website and need top performance, what will it take to reach that goal? It can be hard to scale out one big website. Are you seeking to host one high-performing website or a network of lower-traffic websites? Is your traffic relatively even throughout the year, or are there days when your site sees 10x or even 1000x times the traffic? Your definition of performance may differ. How do you define security? Is it based on certifications, like SOC2 audits? Is it based on specific hosting features, like proactive protection against common security holes? Is it based not on capabilities but on who owns what layers of the stack? A Drupal site owner has much greater responsibility for the security of a Drupal site on AWS or Linode than hosting with a managed provider. You must also know what each of these criteria means for your organization. If you're a marketing agency, you don't want an insecure website, but you probably care more about performance and price. If you're a financial institution, you'll want to prioritize security. If you had the choice between a cheap solution or a more secure solution, which one would you go for? It depends. To prioritize, however, you must have a clear view of your goals. Otherwise, you'll have stakeholders that want all of these things equally, to the maximum measure. Consistency with updates of the underlying softwareīut you can't just list the things you want.Or alternatively, why is your current hosting solution not working? Where is it falling short? There are several things to evaluate: Here are some questions to ask to ensure you choose the appropriate home for your investment. If your project warrants a CMS like Drupal, you need to ensure your hosting platform matches. Deciding where to host should not be an afterthought.Ĭomplex websites with content management, media management, and authenticated users have more complex hosting requirements than simple static websites. You've spent a lot of time and money on your website (or websites). Every website needs a host, and a fantastic website on a mismatched hosting platform can become a terrible website.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |